Quote:
Originally Posted by ajcody
Thanks for the comments Ravno...
I revised my count...and have attached it...
From what I can tell we might be in the beginnings of a wave c advance...
|
Yes, looks good.
Just for training purposes, i've just created the alternate count, because we always need one in order not to get surpised...
I personally don't like this alternate, by the way.
To me it looks more like 1-2-3 instead of the first (a)-(b)-(c) then wave (4) instead of x and then, finally, a kind of ending diagonal.
But. The both counts are correct from the point of view of the Elliott Waves rules.
So, good luck !